WindowsASPNETHosting.in VS InlandHost
WindowsASPNETHosting.in VS InlandHost | At the point when picking ASP.NET Core 1.1 hosting sites one must set aside a few minutes to pay special mind to ones that have been attempted and tried by different clients. An incredible place to look is forums, discussion boards and review site to counteract running into nonstop issues connected with hosting your site.
By investing little energy to do this exploration you get the chance to spare time and your notoriety later on. If the ASP.NET Core 1.1 hosting site is not dependable, your site won’t not keeps running and in addition it ought to and without client bolster administrations when future issues are experienced you won’t not discover routes around it.
This time we would like to work out a comprehensive comparison of this web hosts to figure out whether WindowsASPNETHosting.in really have strengths to win InlandHost for a long term. After testing their hosting plans, we compare WindowsASPNETHosting.in with InlandHost from several aspects like speed, uptime, price, and features.
ASP.NET Core 1.1 Hosting – Speed Comparison
The speed of your site hosting truly does make a difference. While you ought to concentrate the greater part of your exertion in building content that draws in viewers, you must have the capacity to convey to them a pleasurable and speedy experience once they’re at your site.
So, to avoid you choose slow hosting provider, we have compared the speed between WindowsASPNETHosting.in and InlandHost.
WindowsASPNETHosting.in Speed
InlandHost Speed
ASP.NET Core 1.1 Hosting – Uptime Comparison
We have compared WindowsASPNETHosting.in and InlandHost with useful tools from uptrends.com/tools/uptime. Based on the result from that tools, WindowsASPNETHosting.in just tooks 0.2 s from Hong Kong, 1.4 s from Tokyo, 1.4 s from New Delhi and 0.8 s from Seoul.
While InlandHost tooks 0.6 s from Hong Kong, 1.0 s from Tokyo, 0.6 s from New Delhi and 1.1 s from Seoul. From this result, we have concluded that WindowsASPNETHosting.in faster than InlandHost and WindowsASPNETHosting.in is the right choice ASP.NET Hosting Provider for you who life in Asia.
WindowsASPNETHosting.in Uptime
InlandHost Uptime
ASP.NET Core 1.1 Hosting – Price and Features Comparison
WindowsASPNETHosting.in and InlandHost support Windows and Linux hosting platform. They have many features, good technical support, fast customer service, and good reputation. Below here, you can see their hosting plan and features comparison that we made based on the information from their website.
Provider | Spec | Price | Total |
3 GB Disk Space | INR 200/mo | INR 200/mo | |
30 GB Bandwidth | |||
2 MSSQL db | |||
2 MySQL db | |||
8 GB RAM or higher | |||
Host unlimited Sites | |||
InlandHost | 1 GB Disk Space | INR 800/mo | INR 800/mo |
Unlimited Bandwidth | |||
No MSSQL db | |||
No MySQL db | |||
Unknown RAM size | |||
Host 1 Site |
Summary
From above comparison result, we conclude that WindowsASPNETHosting.in is better ASP.NET Hosting Provider than InlandHost. From Speed, Uptime, Price, and Features, WindowsASPNETHosting.in get better value. If you want to check more details about them or prove this comparison, you can visit their website and compare their speed with uptrends.com/tools/uptime.