WindowsASPNETHosting.in VS BigRock
WindowsASPNETHosting.in VS BigRock | To showcase your products and/or services you need to have a website. ASP.NET Core 1.1 hosting company that you choose greatly determines how your customers interact with your ASP.NET Core 1.1 site. If the company is crappy your ASP.NET Core 1.1 site will always be down thus your customers won’t be able to easily navigate through it.
This will not only result to reduced web visits, it can also result to loss of customers. To protect the most important resource for your business-customers, you have to choose the right ASP.NET Core 1.1 hosting company.
This time we would like to work out a comprehensive comparison of this web hosts to figure out whether WindowsASPNETHosting.in really have strengths to win BigRock for a long term. After testing their hosting plans, we compare WindowsASPNETHosting.in with BigRock from several aspects like speed, uptime, price, and features.
ASP.NET Core 1.1 Hosting – Speed Comparison
Google made us mindful about a year prior that site speed would be included into their algorithm which was further moved down by them including webpage performance into website admin devices which indicates how quick your webpage is contrasted with different destinations.
Be that as it may, they have as of late made an official declaration on the Google Webmaster Central Blog that they are presently incorporating it in their search ranking algorithm.
So, to avoid you choose slow hosting provider, we have compared the speed between WindowsASPNETHosting.in and BigRock.
WindowsASPNETHosting.in Speed
BigRock Speed
ASP.NET Core 1.1 Hosting – Uptime Comparison
We have compared WindowsASPNETHosting.in and BigRock with useful tools from uptrends.com/tools/uptime. Based on the result from that tools, WindowsASPNETHosting.in just tooks 0.2 s from Hong Kong, 1.4 s from Tokyo, 1.4 s from New Delhi and 0.8 s from Seoul.
While BigRock tooks 0.9 s from Hong Kong, 3.4 s from Tokyo, 0.6 s from New Delhi and 1.9 s from Seoul. From this result, we have concluded that WindowsASPNETHosting.in faster than BigRock and WindowsASPNETHosting.in is the right choice ASP.NET Hosting Provider for you who life in Asia.
WindowsASPNETHosting.in Uptime
BigRock Uptime
ASP.NET Core 1.1 Hosting – Price and Features Comparison
WindowsASPNETHosting.in and BigRock support Windows and Linux hosting platform. They have many features, good technical support, fast customer service, and good reputation. Below here, you can see their hosting plan and features comparison that we made based on the information from their website.
Provider | Spec | Price | Total |
1 GB Disk Space | INR 70/mo | INR 70/mo | |
10 GB Bandwidth | |||
No MSSQL db | |||
No MySQL db | |||
8 GB RAM or higher | |||
Host 1 Site | |||
BigRock | 500 MB Disk Space | INR 59/mo | INR 59/mo |
2 GB Bandwidth | |||
No MSSQL db | |||
No MySQL db | |||
Unknown RAM size | |||
Host 1 Site |
Summary
From above comparison result, we conclude that WindowsASPNETHosting.in is better ASP.NET Hosting Provider than BigRock. From Speed, Uptime, Price, and Features, WindowsASPNETHosting.in get better value. If you want to check more details about them or prove this comparison, you can visit their website and compare their speed with uptrends.com/tools/uptime.